首页> 外文OA文献 >Inactivation of Salmonella enterica on romaine lettuce following spraying with Pro-San\u3csup\u3eTM\u3c/sup\u3e - a biodegradable foodgrade sanitizer
【2h】

Inactivation of Salmonella enterica on romaine lettuce following spraying with Pro-San\u3csup\u3eTM\u3c/sup\u3e - a biodegradable foodgrade sanitizer

机译:在Pro-San \ u3csup \ u3eTM \ u3c / sup \ u3e-一种可生物降解的食品级消毒剂喷雾后,在生菜上灭活肠沙门氏菌

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The efficacy of various solutions of Pro-SanTM were tested on romaine lettuce leaves against Salmonella enterica in a biofilm. Pro-SanTM LC and Pro-SanTM LC Soft were tested at two dilutions, 0.78% and 0.19%, at various time points and compared to a dry control and 150 ppm bleach solution, which is the currently used industry standard. Both sanitizers are bio-degradable GRAS sanitizers composed of an organic acid and a surfactant, with a pH around 2.2.Three replicates were completed, and three variables were analyzed using SAS (Statistical Analysis Software): time, treatment, and treatment*time. The time and treatment variables had significant differences (a\u3c0.05), but because the time*treatment variable was not significant, the ratio among the treatments was not different among the times. Therefore, Salmonellacounts for each time were logged and averaged. A Tukey pairwise t-test was obtained from this data, which indicated that the dry control, distilled water control, and 150 ppm bleach solution were not significantly different from each other, but were less effective than the Pro-SanTM solutions when the treatments were tested at room temperature. At refrigerated temperature, the same trend among treatments existed but only the 0.78% solutions were statistically more effective than the dry control, distilled water control, and only the 0.78% Pro-SanTM was more effective than the bleach solution.Quality effects (including color, flavor, texture, etc) were also analyzed (usind a Hunter L*a*b* colorimeter and a sensory panel), and no significant difference was observed between the treatment groups and the control groups.The experiment was replicated with Eschericia coli O157:H7, but discontinued due to an inability to distinguish pathogenic colonies from nonpathogenic colonies on Sorbital MacConkey agar.
机译:在生菜叶片上的生膜上测试了Pro-SanTM各种溶液的抗生物沙门氏菌的功效。 Pro-SanTM LC和Pro-SanTM LC Soft在不同时间点分别以0.78%和0.19%的两种稀释度进行了测试,并与目前使用的行业标准干对照和150 ppm漂白剂溶液进行了比较。两种消毒剂都是可降解的GRAS消毒剂,由有机酸和表面活性剂组成,pH值约为2.2。完成了三个重复实验,并使用SAS(统计分析软件)对三个变量进行了分析:时间,处理和处理*时间。时间和治疗变量具有显着性差异(a \ u3c0.05),但是由于时间*治疗变量不显着,因此治疗之间的比率在各次之间没有差异。因此,记录每次沙门氏菌计数并取平均值。从该数据获得Tukey成对t检验,表明干燥对照,蒸馏水对照和150 ppm漂白剂溶液彼此之间无显着差异,但在处理效果良好时,效果不如Pro-SanTM溶液。在室温下测试。在冷藏温度下,各处理之间存在相同的趋势,但统计学上仅0.78%的溶液比干对照,蒸馏水控制更有效,而只有0.78%的Pro-SanTM比漂白剂更有效。还分析了(味道,质地等)(使用Hunter L * a * b *色度计和感官面板),在治疗组和对照组之间没有观察到显着差异。该实验用大肠杆菌O157进行了重复:H7,但由于无法区分Sorbital MacConkey琼脂上的致病菌落和非致病菌落而中断。

著录项

  • 作者

    Drury, Julianne Elise;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号